Skip to main content
The WikipediaStudio
HomeAbout UsServicesPricingOur ProcessPortfolioBlogFAQContact
Get Started
W
The WikipediaStudio

We craft credible, authoritative, and impactful Wikipedia pages that elevate your presence or brand reputation worldwide.

Guideline-ledSource-firstWorldwide

Trustpilot reviews·Leave a review

Quick Links

HomeAbout UsServicesPricingOur ProcessPortfolioBlogFAQContactNotability checkerHow to choose an agency

Services

Wikipedia Page CreationPage Editing & ExpansionContent Writing & ResearchOngoing Page ManagementReputation & Entity BuildingNotability AssessmentGoogle Knowledge Panel CreationWikipedia Page Monitoring

Contact Us

info@thewikipediastudio.com+1 (218) 305-9586Remote-first · Worldwide servicesTrustpilot reviews

The Wikipedia Studio is an independent editorial service and is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.

© 2026 The Wikipedia Studio. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsResourcesSitemap
  1. Home
  2. Case Studies

Case studies

Source-first Wikipedia case studies

Short narratives from published portfolio work: what we looked for in the sources, how drafting stayed neutral, and why disclosure and aftercare matter. Outcomes are never guaranteed.

View full portfolio Request assessment

Published work

What the process looked like on real files

David Bianchi

Independent coverage first, then a durable biography structure

The engagement started with a source audit: which outlets covered the subject independently, how deep that coverage ran, and whether the record could support a durable article. Drafting emphasised source hierarchy — claims entered only when a reliable citation could carry them. Paid editing was disclosed. Volunteer review still decides outcomes; a source-first draft is what gives an article its best chance to survive.

Open portfolio page

Peter Abell

Proportion, neutrality, and post-publication realism

Work focused on verifying independent reporting, avoiding résumé padding, and keeping living-person material inside policy. After acceptance, accuracy still depends on new independent reporting — monitoring catches vandalism and contested edits, but nobody can lock a page against the community.

Open portfolio page
Start with clarity

Want this level of source discipline on your file?

Free notability assessment first.

Get started