W
The Wikipedia Studio is an independent editorial service and is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.
The Wikipedia Studio is an independent editorial service and is not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.
About The Wikipedia Studio
We are a team of Wikipedia specialists, researchers, and content strategists dedicated to creating, improving, and managing articles that meet the platform's strict guidelines and deliver real-world credibility.
About Us
The Wikipedia Studio — Wiki Studio for short — is an independent Wikipedia service provider that helps people, companies, and institutions earn an accurate presence on Wikipedia — the reference that search engines, journalists, and AI assistants turn to first.
We were built around one observation: most Wikipedia drafts fail not because of bad writing, but because nobody checked whether the sources were there. So we research first, tell clients plainly what the coverage supports, and only then write — neutrally, with every claim cited and every paid contribution disclosed.
Our specialists work remote-first with clients worldwide, across academia, publishing, business, technology, the arts, and the non-profit sector.
Start with a free notability assessmentTo give every notable subject an accurate, neutral, well-sourced Wikipedia article — and to say so honestly when the sources are not there yet.
A Wikipedia presence clients never have to worry about: compliant on day one, maintained over time, and trusted by readers and editors alike.
No fake guarantees, no undisclosed editing, and no shortcuts that put your article at risk of tagging or deletion.
How We Work
Wikipedia is not a marketing channel, and treating it like one is the most common reason articles get rejected, tagged, or deleted. Our work starts from the platform's own rules — notability, verifiability, and neutral point of view — and everything else follows from them.
That means we sometimes deliver news a client does not want to hear. We would rather say so in week one than take a commission for an article that cannot survive review.
Our Principles
The rules every engagement runs on — whoever the client is and whatever the brief says.
Every substantive statement is tied to an independent, reliable source. If a claim cannot be verified, it does not appear in the article.
Paid editing is permitted on Wikipedia when it is declared. We declare it, on the record, rather than editing covertly.
Source discovery comes first. The available coverage decides what the article can say — not a brief, and not a wish list.
No guarantees of approval, no invented notability. You get a clear assessment of what is achievable before anything is commissioned.
Every Engagement
At The Wikipedia Studio, every client gets the same safeguards — whatever the subject, and whichever package applies.
A written verdict on whether independent coverage supports an article — before any fee is agreed.
Every usable reference graded for independence, reliability, and depth, and mapped to the claims it supports.
Encyclopedic prose in Wikipedia's own tone, with every substantive statement tied to a reliable source.
A second editor checks each claim against its citation before anything is submitted for review.
Paid-contribution disclosure on-wiki, as Wikipedia's terms of use require — never an undeclared account.
Monitoring through the early, unstable period, with clear updates whenever meaningful edits arrive.
Editorial Standards
Three checks that keep every draft accurate, sourced, and disclosed — before it ever reaches Wikipedia.
Every draft passes through two editors. The first researches and writes; the second checks each claim against the source cited for it, with no involvement in the drafting.
Sources are graded before anything is written, on independence, reliability, and depth of coverage. We record which source supports which statement.
Paid contributions are disclosed on Wikipedia as its terms of use require. We do not operate undeclared accounts.
Editorial Team
We publish the desk structure behind assessments and drafts. Named personal bios are added when individuals choose to be listed; until then you still know who does what, and that paid work is disclosed.
Editorial standards, dual-review workflow, and paid-disclosure compliance
Owns final quality before anything is filed: notability fit, neutrality, citation integrity, and Wikimedia disclosure language. Declines engagements that would require promotional framing or undeclared editing.
Source discovery, reliability grading, and citation mapping
Builds the source dossier before drafting begins — grading outlets for independence, depth, and editorial control. Maps every substantive claim to a usable reference and documents coverage gaps in plain language.
Neutral drafting, structure, and living-person care
Turns graded sources into encyclopedic prose with proportion and tone reviewers expect. Expands or repairs live articles without résumé padding, and keeps sensitive biography material inside policy.
Watchlists, vandalism triage, and stabilisation after publication
Watches published pages through their unstable early period, classifies incoming edits, escalates contested changes, and keeps clients informed without pretending anyone can lock an article.
Want a named editor on record for your engagement? Ask at enquiry — disclosure still happens on-wiki either way.
Our Team
Our researchers and editors work inside Wikipedia's own policies — notability, verifiability, and neutral point of view — giving us a firsthand understanding of what survives review, and what gets tagged or deleted.
Who We Work With
What they share is independent coverage — the one thing Wikipedia asks for before anything else.
Authors, academics, executives, founders, artists, and public figures with a documented record in independent media.
Companies whose history, products, and milestones have been covered by independent business and trade press.
Non-profits, institutions, and associations that need an accurate, neutral public record of what they do.
Client Testimonials
Next Steps
Two free ways to find out where your subject stands before you talk to anyone.
Free Tool
Answer a few questions about the coverage you already have and see whether a Wikipedia article is realistic — before you spend anything.
Learn MoreWikipedia 101
Wikipedia looks for significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject — not followers, fame, or advertising. Our guides explain what counts and what does not.
Learn MoreLet our experts help you establish credibility and create a lasting impact on Wikipedia.
Get Started Today
